Sam Leah: A Radical Severing of Violence from Freedom

By Sam Leah / Deep Green Resistance Eugene

There has recently been a great deal of debate around the topic of consent in sexual politics. Stakeholders in this debate have vocalized a wide range of positions, from positing the centrality of consent in questions of sexual ethics to considering the negative implications of undivided attention allotted to it. Meanwhile, on the ground, a certain kind of pornography starring women being tied up, chained, gagged and penetrated, whipped, and made to bleed has become exceedingly popular and widely sought out. To understand the nature, let alone the implications, of this kind of pornography, we have to understand its origins—the origins of Sadomasochism.

Marquis de Sade, a prominent member of nobility and a convicted rapist, kidnapper, and abuser was the namesake of the term sadism. Although he is now celebrated throughout philosophical and literary discourse as somewhat of a pop icon, Sade was undoubtedly a deviant of the most sordid variety. In her book Pornography: Men Possessing Women, Andrea Dworkin devotes a whole chapter to enumerating Sade’s abundant sexual escapades and convictions in a worthy attempt to expose him for the fiend he was. Among his atrocities, Sade was guilty of torture, poisoning, kidnapping children, and raping countless women. Sade’s ill formed justifications for these actions are articulated in his pornographic literature now commonly consumed as erotic philosophy. In his works, he claims to be an advocate of absolute freedom, a right he argues needs to be realized in sexual practice.

Needless to say, his conception of absolute freedom did not apply to his victims. To conceal this obvious inconsistency, Sade argued that the recipients of his violence would enjoy it, even ask for it, if they were to just surrender their prudish boundaries and openly realize their repressed sexuality. It is my opinion that anyone with a pulse who reads a factual account of Sade’s life would want to distance themselves as much as is worldly possible from this individual and his legacy. And yet, amazingly, in recent years sadism has become not only popular but widely accepted. This philosophy, stemming from a man who made no secret of the fact that he derived the greatest pleasure from inflicting bodily pain onto unwitting victims is flourishing even in activist circles, the communities that are supposed to be the most concerned with justice.

Sade’s legacy, the concept of absolute freedom applied to sexual practice, continues to legitimize the widespread dissemination of the most vicious sexual scenes imaginable. Instead of recognizing the practice of sexual violence as what it is—sexual violence—the ideology of freedom has precluded the possibility for critique, calling any challenge censorship. This practice has silenced the victims of pornography as well as those who question the ethics of enjoying the same treatment that has marked the most horrific of atrocities. This is called ideological orthodoxy, more commonly known as dogma. The job of radicals—those who get to the root of things, those who consider material circumstances, not merely ideals—is to challenge ideologies when they begin to threaten the lives of real humans.

As Andrea Dworkin has said, “when theory becomes an impediment to action, it is time to discard the theory and return naked, that is, without theory, to the world of reality.” As Sade has shown us, what the theory of absolute freedom in practice really means is freedom for some at the expense of others. In the case of BDSM culture, absolute freedom means freedom for rapists at the expense of the raped and freedom for abusers at the expense of the abused. This, of course, is the legacy of this culture from its birth—the history of oppression masquerading as freedom.

Today, the reason those in charge of producing violent pornography haven’t been jailed for sexual abuse and torture is that the stars, or victims, of these shows have consented to this treatment. Further, many have actually expressed pleasure from participation in these scenes. This fact is enough to placate most people who would vehemently object to such overtly violent sexual acts and to turn those on the fence into vocal supporters. And why wouldn’t people be convinced when the apparent victims themselves have claimed consent, and even enjoyment of such treatment? This is where the conversation usually ends—with the contentment of the recipients of violence and the acceptance that the violence must then be legitimate. However, during all of the discussion around consent, a rather conspicuous lack of attention has been paid to the real life implications of eroticizing violence in popular culture. Further, there has been an even greater failure to question or even remotely address the ethical rightness of finding pleasure in pain.

In one exception, Meghan Murphy’s excellent article “The Tyranny of Consent” articulately explains some of the problems with solely focusing on consent of the victim when it comes to the mass distribution of violent pornography. She reminds us that those affected by pornography are more than the participants. In fact, pornography is one of the most profitable businesses on the market meaning that the products of pornography are being consumed on a mass and even mass majority scale. So let’s ask ourselves what happens when the majority of men are watching women being hung on meat hooks, chained, slapped, and penetrated in every orifice while simultaneously smiling, a testimony to their enjoyment. Well, what happens is that these same men go into the real world expecting the same from their sexual encounters. These men will try, if not forcefully succeed, in re-enacting these scenarios.

Testimony to this fact lies in the countless incidents of pornography’s role in rape, sexual assault, and even rape after murder. There have been thousands of reported cases that attest to this horrible truth and many more that go unreported. Too often, men show women pornography before maiming and raping them, expecting them to enjoy the treatment because the women in the videos seemed to. [1] A less commonly known fact is that the majority of women who participate in pornography or prostitution have been raped or sexually abused as children. [2] Further, it is known by those who have listened to the stories of women that in most cases of hardcore pornography, women are forced into the work through either economic or brute coercion. In reality, their smiles do not indicate enjoyment. What their smiles indicate is the silencing of these women’s stories and the stories of others like them.

To those who have publicly attested to their enjoyment of these films, I ask them to consider the lives of those who have endured the same treatment but without the magic word of consent. Are those women expected to watch and understand as their torture is reenacted as a legitimized means of entertainment? What the popularization of violent pornography is telling these women is that they could and maybe should have enjoyed their rapes. After all, if some women have, why don’t they all? This is victim blaming, no matter how you dress it up.

Despite the fact that the concepts of consent and absolute freedom have taken on almost religious sanctity in this culture, it is my opinion that these ideologies have done a great deal more damage than they are worth. In truth, they have functioned as very effective ways to obfuscate the fact that the same kind of violence that plagues women and victims every moment of every day is being eroticized and disguised as love. Further, I think christening sexual violence and the enjoyment of pain as neutral is an excellent way to divert attention from the reality that there is something categorically wrong with finding pleasure in violence, whether you’re the giver or receiver. I think it’s worth noting to those who advocate for sadism that they share the mentality of rapists, sex offenders, and pedophiles. And it’s also valid to point out that those who enjoy being dominated and abused are enjoying the treatment of the raped and the sexually assaulted. There are no shades of gray about this demarcation and there is nothing benign about blurring the lines between pleasure and abuse.

In the end it all boils down to the fact that this culture is sick and sickness has become the norm. Sick are the forests, sick are the rivers, sick is the soil, and sick are we. If we are to think radically and honestly about the eroticization of violence, then we’d realize that its acceptance works in favor of the oppressors—the same individuals doing the destruction of human and nonhuman lives. While liberals ask us to merely change our mindsets about the atrocities that are happening, as radicals we ask for material change. When atrocities are happening, we must fight them tooth and nail, not decide that they can be legitimate, enjoyable, or erotic, under the right circumstances.  The question of whether violent pornography hurts women has well been proven in the affirmative if not absolutely by scientific studies then by the voices of the women victims themselves. If we choose to ignore their stories, we stand with the oppressors, the rapists and the abusers. If we choose to listen, we are engendered with a responsibility to act.

[1] See “Pornography is a Civil Rights Issue” by Andrea Dworkin for a detailed recounting of such cases. This speech was delivered before the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography in 1986 as testimony to the fact that pornography does in fact harm women.

[2] See “Pornography and Sexual Abuse of Women,” by Mimi H. Silber and Ayala M. Pines in Sex Roles, Vol. 10, Nos. 11/12, 1984, pp. 857-868

9 thoughts on “Sam Leah: A Radical Severing of Violence from Freedom”

  1. An excellently written piece. As a culture, the erotic connection to soul in the body and its creativity has been mostly hijacked by industry-driven digital media and manufactured consent – that’s a fact that we all co-exist with. There can be no “informed choice” or “consent” in a society with a prefabricated reality composed of industrialized domination values, within a framework of sexual violence, which also works really well with violence against the land.

    As for healthy roots and the wings to fly free, it’s up to you, and me, and WE to stop this violence and to reclaim our own brains. This article is part of it, thank you so much, Sam.

    I’m really glad that the longtime work of Gary Wilson re neurological patterning related to the digital culture of pornographic hegemony is finally getting notice, it’s very timely.

    Anyone who has been socialized with violent porn (which all porn dependency leads to these days, so if you start at age 11 you’re there by 18) but who also cares about ecology and the truly wild (the infinite birdsongs, the buffalo, the starfish, the whale communication system, the seahorse poppas – as well as full-capacity human development) is gonna have to reclaim their brain, basically. And once that brain is reclaimed, deep green resistance is a real possibility…. There is an inherent connection between our sexuality and our ecology and human culture in general.

  2. I’d just like to address one section of your article:

    “Further, I think christening sexual violence and the enjoyment of pain as neutral is an excellent way to divert attention from the reality that there is something categorically wrong with finding pleasure in violence, whether you’re the giver or receiver.I think it’s worth noting to those who advocate for sadism that they share the mentality of rapists, sex offenders, and pedophiles. And it’s also valid to point out that those who enjoy being dominated and abused are enjoying the treatment of the raped and the sexually assaulted. There are no shades of gray about this demarcation and there is nothing benign about blurring the lines between pleasure and abuse.”

    1. Citing “the reality that there is something categorically wrong with finding pleasure in violence” to condemn BDSM is begging the question twice (firstly with the dubious use of the phrase “categorically wrong,” and secondly with the unjustified equation of BDSM with sexual violence).

    2. To draw such comparisons between BDSM play and sexual violence is to insult both victims of sexual violence and participants in BDSM play.

    3. You might find this article interesting:

    4. I’m honestly quite tired of seeing BDSM and other alternative sexualities cast as social ills.

  3. Dear Concerned,
    1. On a material level, there is no difference between sexual violence and BDSM. The only difference lies in the ideal realm (consent). This felt consent does not translate over the internet when BDSM type pornography is made mainstream. What translates over is that torture can be sexy. I find the inevitable results of this conflation to be categorically wrong.

    2. To eroticize the same material treatment that victims of sexual violence undergo is not only insulting but physically harmful to those victims. If I have to insult participants in BDSM to get this point across, then I don’t mind.

    3. No single study could nullify the testimonies of women. That science is now taking strides to back the eroticization of violence is only proof that the tools of western culture have never served the interests of women.

    4. I’m quite tired of people (most always men) going out of their way to advocate and argue for BDSM culture when there are countless women’s voices speaking out against it. I will never side with your right to sexual freedom over women’s rights to not be raped and tortured.

  4. Mr. Leah, as I would expect from most poorly educated Americans, misses the point entirely when it comes to the philosophical implications of the Marquis’ life and work. It’s quite telling that he does not reference what is arguably the most famous analysis on the subject: Simone de Beauvoir’s study. It’s not suprising, given that introducing French radical thought to a DGR audience might them lead down the slippery slope to the anti-psychiatric current in post structuralism. After all, we want to keep our American deep ecologists as dumbed down and inarticulate as possible. All hail the F bomb. Sadly, I’ve pretty much given up hope on American as sentient beings, let alone a force for radical change. Au Revoir.

  5. Rowan,
    Firstly, I am a woman (Samantha is my fully name). Secondly, I studied Literature and Philosophy and graduated Cum Laude at my University. Your entirely unfounded and incorrect characterization of me is indicative of your baseless argument in favor of Sade’s “philosophy.” You are yet another man defending sexual violence via self gratifying philosophical theory.

    And yes, I did in fact study Simone de Beauvior and read her analysis supporting Sade. She, like many others, argued entirely from a philosophical standpoint and completely failed to consider the material implications of Sade’s work.

    This issue is not about philosophy and it’s not about yours or my ideas. This is about the real lives of women who are being violated and abused.

  6. ###like many others, argued entirely from a philosophical standpoint and completely failed to consider the material implications of Sade’s work.+++

    That’s utter bollocks. Seems like you’re intentionally trying to discredit yourself.Thanks for proving my point. I’m highly skeptical of any representative of a group that goes on controlled left media (DN!) and advocates for assassination (Jensen) that’s a major red flag. If you graduated from University in America then you have the equivalent of a high school degree in most other global north countries. Frankly, all Americans no matter what stripe of politics or gender etc deserve a health dose of Satanic torture. They should stick to the three F’s Fighting Finance and Fucking. Leave the thinking to the rest of the world please. Good day Madame.

    1. Rowan trees are sacred in the pre-christian tradition of Ireland, but the fantastical Anglophilia of R.B. appears to be cover for either a lot of infantile pain or an addiction to drama – in the very least it’s dishonest, as no Brit with any hipness says Madame anymore… unless he is employed in the equine sex show scene of the elite, in which case he would be too busy for bloggin. I would think it highly likely that R.B. lives in a basement somewhere in Orange County and has likely never crossed the pond! LOL

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *