By Associated Press
The world’s energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose 1.4 percent in 2012 to a record high of 31.6 billion tons, even though the U.S. posted its lowest emissions since the mid-1990s, the International Energy Agency said Monday.
In its annual World Energy Outlook report, the Paris-based IEA said top carbon polluter China had the largest emissions growth last year, up 300 million tons, or 3.8 percent, from 2011. Still, the increase was among the lowest seen in a decade as China continues to invest in renewable energy and energy efficiency.
U.S. emissions dropped 200 million tons, or 3.8 percent, in part due to a switch in power generation from coal to gas, while Europe’s emissions declined by 50 million tons, or 1.4 percent, the IEA said.
The agency said the energy sector accounts for about two-thirds of global emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases, which scientists say are fueling climate change.
Global climate talks are aimed at keeping the temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 F) compared with pre-industrial levels. The IEA found the world’s on track for an increase of 3.6-5.3 C (6.5-9.5 F).
“Climate change has quite frankly slipped to the back burner of policy priorities. But the problem is not going away – quite the opposite,” said IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven.
Climate scientists have warned that the global temperature rise could have catastrophic consequences such as flooding of coastal cities and island nations, disruptions to agriculture and drinking water, and the spread of diseases and the extinction of species.
I call Bull on the line, “much more can be done to tackle energy-sector emissions without jeopardising economic growth.”
As long as the goal is growth on a finite, stressed planet, all species are doomed.
Rad is correct – you can’t have infinite growth with finite resources, no matter how much you want to. Plus, any more than 1.5 C rise, and the SHTF for every living thing on Earth. 3.6 to 5.3 C rise means extinction, not inconvenience.
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pznsPkJy2x8
And: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOrvGDRLT7A
Thank you for saying this. We agree this is a ridiculous statement and have swapped the Agence France-Presse story for the version published by the AP.