Editor’s note: Leftists often see authoritarianism as a hallmark of conservative, right-wing, and fascist governments and organizations. But throughout history, there is an equally troubling trend of left-wing authoritarianism.
Today, this strain of politics is ascendant in the United States, where the use of censorship and violence to curtail political speech has become increasingly accepted and mainstream both among Democratic-party ideologues, media and tech elites, and the professional managerial class, and among college-educated “radical” leftists.
In today’s piece, Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Chris Hedges discusses the normalization of “cancel culture” as a sign of increasing corporate control and the fading of liberal values that protected basic political expression. For a decade, Deep Green Resistance has been targeted by what Hedges describes as the “boutique activism of a liberal class that lacks the courage and the organizational skills to challenge the actual centers of power.” The footsoldiers of cancel culture are, Hedges writes, “the useful idiots of corporate power and the emerging police state.”
“Cancel culture is not the road to reform,” he concludes. “It is the road to tyranny.”
Elites and their courtiers who trumpet their moral superiority by damning and silencing those who do not linguistically conform to politically correct speech are the new Jacobins.
By Chris Hedges / ScheerPost
The Rev. Will Campbell was forced out of his position as director of religious life at the University of Mississippi in 1956 because of his calls for integration. He escorted Black children through a hostile mob in 1957 to integrate Little Rock’s Central High School. He was the only white person that was invited to be part of the group that founded Martin Luther King Jr.’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference. He helped integrate Nashville’s lunch counters and organize the Freedom Rides.
But Campbell was also, despite a slew of death threats he received from white segregationists, an unofficial chaplain to the local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan. He denounced and publicly fought the Klan’s racism, acts of terror and violence and marched with Black civil rights protestors in his native Mississippi, but he steadfastly refused to “cancel” white racists out of his life. He refused to demonize them as less than human. He insisted that this form of racism, while evil, was not as insidious as a capitalist system that perpetuated the economic misery and instability that pushed whites into the ranks of violent, racist organizations.
“During the civil rights movement, when we were developing strategies, someone usually said, ‘Call Will Campbell. Check with Will,’” Rep. John Lewis wrote in the introduction to the new edition of Campbell’s memoir “Brother to a Dragonfly,” one of the most important books I read as a seminarian. “Will knew that the tragedy of Southern history had fallen on our opponents as well as our allies … on George Wallace and Bull Connor as well as Rosa Parks and Fred Shuttlesworth. He saw that it had created the Ku Klux Klan as well as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. That insight led Will to see racial healing and equity, pursued through courage, love, and faith as the path to spiritual liberation for all.”
Jimmy Carter wrote of Campbell that he “tore down the walls that separated white and black Southerners.” And because the Black Panther organizer Fred Hampton was doing the same thing in Chicago, the FBI — which, along with the CIA, is the de facto ally of the liberal elites in their war against Trump and his supporters — assassinated him.
When the town Campbell lived in decided the Klan should not be permitted to have a float in the Fourth of July parade Campbell did not object, as long as the gas and electric company was also barred. It was not only white racists that inflicted suffering on the innocent and the vulnerable, but institutions that place the sanctity of profit before human life.
“People can’t pay their gas and electric bills, the heat gets turned off and they freeze and sometimes die, especially if they are elderly,” he said. “This, too, is an act of terrorism.”
“Theirs you could see and deal with, and if they broke the law, you could punish them,” he said of the Klan. “But the larger culture that was, and still is, racist to the core is much more difficult to deal with and has a more sinister influence.”
Campbell would have reminded us that the demonization of the Trump supporters who stormed the capital is a terrible mistake. He would have reminded us that racial injustice will only be solved with economic justice. He would have called on us to reach out to those who do not think like us, do not speak like us, are ridiculed by polite society, but who suffer the same economic marginalization. He knew that the disparities of wealth, loss of status and hope for the future, coupled with prolonged social dislocation, generated the poisoned solidarity that give rise to groups such as the Klan or the Proud Boys.
We cannot heal wounds we refuse to acknowledge.
The Washington Post, which analyzed the public records of 125 defendants charged with taking part in the storming of the Capital on January 6, found that “nearly 60 percent of the people facing charges related to the Capitol riot showed signs of prior money troubles, including bankruptcies, notices of eviction or foreclosure, bad debts, or unpaid taxes over the past two decades.”
“The group’s bankruptcy rate — 18 percent — was nearly twice as high as that of the American public,” the Post found. “A quarter of them had been sued for money owed to a creditor. And 1 in 5 of them faced losing their home at one point, according to court filings.”
“A California man filed for bankruptcy one week before allegedly joining the attack, according to public records,” the paper reported. “A Texas man was charged with entering the Capitol one month after his company was slapped with a nearly $2,000 state tax lien. Several young people charged in the attack came from families with histories of financial duress.”
We must acknowledge the tragedy of these lives, while at the same time condemning racism, hate and the lust for violence. We must grasp that our most perfidious enemy is not someone who is politically incorrect, even racist, but the corporations and a failed political and judicial system that callously sacrifices people, as well as the planet, on the altar of profit.
Like Campbell, much of my own family comes from the rural working class, many espousing prejudices my father, a Presbyterian minister, regularly condemned from the pulpit. Through a combination of luck and scholarships to elite schools, I got out. They never did. My grandfather, intellectually gifted, was forced to drop out of high school his senior year when his sister’s husband died. He had to work the farm to feed her children. If you are poor in America, you rarely get more than one chance. And many do not get one. He lost his.
The towns in Maine where my relatives come from have been devastated by the closures of mills and factories. There is little meaningful work. There is a smoldering anger caused by legitimate feelings of betrayal and entrapment. They live, like most working class Americans, lives of quiet desperation. This anger is often expressed in negative and destructive ways. But I have no right to dismiss them as irredeemable.
To understand is not to condone. But if the ruling elites, and their courtiers masquerading as journalists, continue to gleefully erase these people from the media landscape, to attack them as less than human, or as Hillary Clinton called them “deplorables,” while at the same time refusing to address the grotesque social inequality that has left them vulnerable and afraid, it will fuel ever greater levels of extremism and ever greater levels of state repression and censorship.
The cancel culture, a witch hunt by self-appointed moral arbiters of speech, has become the boutique activism of a liberal class that lacks the courage and the organizational skills to challenge the actual centers of power — the military-industrial complex, lethal militarized police, the prison system, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, the intelligence agencies that make us the most spied upon, watched, photographed and monitored population in human history, the fossil fuel industry, and a political and economic system captured by oligarchic power.
It is much easier to turn from these overwhelming battles to take down hapless figures who make verbal gaffes, those who fail to speak in the approved language or embrace the approved attitudes of the liberal elites. These purity tests have reached absurd and self-defeating levels, including the inquisitional bloodlust by 150 staff members of The New York Times demanding that management, which had already investigated and dealt with what at most was poor judgment made by the veteran reporter Don McNeil when he repeated a racist slur in a discussion about race, force him out of the paper, which management reluctantly did.
Too often the targets of the cancel culture are radicals, such as the feminists who run the Vancouver Rape Relief and Women’s Shelter and who do not admit trans people because most of the girls and women in the shelter have been physically assaulted and traumatized by those with male bodies. None of the critics of these feminists spend ten or twelve hours a day in a shelter taking care of abused girls and women, many of whom were prostituted as children, but fire off screeds to attack them and cut their funding. The cancel culture, as the Canadian feminist Lee Lakeman says, is “the weaponization of ignorance.”
The cancel culture was pioneered by the red baiting of the capitalist elites and their shock troops in agencies such as the FBI to break, often through violence, radical movements and labor unions. Tens of thousands of people, in the name of anti-communism, were cancelled out of the culture. The well-financed Israel lobby is a master of the cancel culture, shutting down critics of the Israeli apartheid state and those of us who support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement as anti-Semites. The cancel culture fueled the persecution of Julian Assange, the censorship of WikiLeaks and the Silicon Valley algorithms that steer readers away from content, including my content, critical of imperial and corporate power.
In the end, this bullying will be used by social media platforms, which are integrated into the state security and surveillance organs, not to promote, as its supporters argue, civility, but ruthlessly silence dissidents, intellectuals, artists and independent journalism. Once you control what people say you control what they think.
This cancel culture is embraced by corporate media platforms where, as Glenn Greenwald writes, “teams of journalists at three of the most influential corporate media outlets — CNN’s ‘media reporters’ (Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy), NBC’s ‘disinformation space unit’ (Ben Collins and Brandy Zadrozny), and the tech reporters of The New York Times (Mike Isaac, Kevin Roose, Sheera Frenkel) — devote the bulk of their ‘journalism’ to searching for online spaces where they believe speech and conduct rules are being violated, flagging them, and then pleading that punitive action be taken (banning, censorship, content regulation, after-school detention).”
Corporations know these moral purity tests are, for us, self-defeating. They know that by making the cancel culture legitimate — and for this reason I opposed locking Donald Trump out of his Twitter and other social media accounts — they can employ it to silence those who attack and expose the structures of corporate power and imperial crimes. The campaigns of moral absolutism widen the divides between liberals and the white working class, divisions that are crucial to maintaining the power of the corporate elites. The cancel culture is the fodder for the riveting and entertaining culture wars. It turns anti-politics into politics. Most importantly, the cancel culture deflects attention from the far more egregious institutionalized abuses of power. It is this smug, self-righteousness crusade that makes the liberal class so odious.
Doug Marlette, the Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist who created the comic strip “Kudzu,” which featured a Campbell-inspired character called Rev. Will B. Dunn, brought Campbell to speak at Harvard when I was there. Campbell’s message was met with a mixture of bewilderment and open hostility, which was fine with me as it meant the room swiftly emptied and the rest of the night Marlette, Campbell and I sat up late drinking whiskey and eating bologna sandwiches. Marlette was as iconoclastic and acerbically funny as Campbell. His cartoons, including one that showed Jesus on Good Friday carrying an electric chair instead of a cross and another that portrayed Jerry Falwell as the serpent in the Garden of Eden, provoked howls of protest from irate readers.
Campbell’s memoir, “Brother to a Dragonfly,” is not only beautifully written — Campbell was a close friend of Walker Percy, whose novels I also consumed — but filled with a humility and wisdom that liberals, who should spend less time in the self-referential rabbit hole of social media, have lost. He describes America, which routinely employs murder, torture, threats, blackmail and intimidation to crush all those who oppose it at home and abroad, as “a nation of Klansmen.” He refused to draw a moral line between the American empire, which many liberals defend, and the disenfranchised and angry whites that flock to racist groups such as the Klan or, years later, would support Trump. The architects of empire and the ruling capitalists who exploited workers, stymied democracy, orchestrated state repression, hoarded obscene levels of wealth and waged endless war were, he knew, the real enemy.
Campbell remembers watching a documentary by CBS called “The Ku Klux Klan: An Invisible Empire,” after which he was invited to address the audience. The film showed the murder of the three civil rights workers in Mississippi, the castration of Judge Aaron in Alabama, and the deaths of the four young girls in the Birmingham Sunday school bombing. When the film showed a Klan recruit pivoting right when the drill master shouted, “Left face,” the audience erupted in “cheers, jeers, catcalls and guffaws.” Campbell writes that he “felt a sickening in my stomach.”
Those viewing the film were a group convened by the National Student Association and included New Left radicals of the sixties, representing Students for a Democratic Society, the Port Huron group, young white men and women who had led protests at campuses across the country, burned down buildings, coined the term “pigs” to refer to police. Many were from affluent families.
“They were students in or recent graduates of rich and leading colleges and universities,” he writes of the audience. “They were mean and tough but somehow, I sensed that there wasn’t a radical in the bunch. For if they were radical how could they laugh at a poor ignorant farmer who didn’t know his left hand from his right? If they had been radical they would have been weeping, asking what had produced him. And if they had been radical they would not have been sitting, soaking up a film produced for their edification and enjoyment by the Establishment of the establishment — CBS.”
Campbell, who was asked to address the group following the film, said: “My name is Will Campbell. I’m a Baptist preacher. I’m a native of Mississippi. And I’m pro-Klansman because I’m pro-human being.”
Pandemonium erupted in the hall. He was shouted down as a “fascist pig” and a “Mississippi redneck.” Most walked out.
“Just four words uttered — ‘pro-Klansman Mississippi Baptist preacher,’ coupled with one visual image, white, had turned them into everything they thought the Ku Klux Klan to be — hostile, frustrated, angry, violent and irrational,” he writes. “And I was never able to explain to them that pro-Klansman is not the same as pro-Klan. That the former has to do with a person, the other with an ideology.”
“The same social forces which produced the Klan’s violence also produced the violence in Watts, Rochester and Harlem, Cleveland, Chicago, Houston, Nashville, Atlanta and Dayton, because they are all pieces of the same garment — social isolation, deprivation, economic conditions, rejections, working mothers, poor schools, bad diets, and all the rest,” Campbell writes.
And these social forces produced the nationwide Black Lives Matter protests after the police murder of George Floyd and the storming of the Capitol by an enraged mob.
Campbell never asked any of the members of the Klan he knew to leave the organization for the same reason he never asked liberals to leave “the respectable and fashionable organizations or institutions of which they were a part and party, all of which, I was learning, were more truly racist than their Klan.”
This radical love was the core of Dr. Martin Luther King’s message. This love informed King’s steadfast nonviolence. It led him to denounce the Vietnam War and condemn the US government as “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” And it saw him assassinated in Memphis when he was supporting a strike by sanitation workers for economic justice.
Campbell lived by his oft-quoted creed, “If you’re gonna love one, you’ve got to love ‘em all.” Like King, he believed in the redemptive and transformative power of forgiveness.
The ruling elites and the courtiers who trumpet their moral superiority by damning and silencing those who do not linguistically conform to politically correct speech are the new Jacobins. They wallow in a sanctimonious arrogance, one made possible by their privilege, which masks their subservience to corporate power and their amorality. They do not battle social and economic injustice. They silence, with the enthusiastic assistance of the digital platforms in Silicon Valley, those who are crushed and deformed by systems of oppression and those who lack their finely developed politesse and deference to linguistic fashion. They are the useful idiots of corporate power and the emerging police state. Cancel culture is not the road to reform. It is the road to tyranny.
[Chris Hedges writes a regular original column for ScheerPost. Click here to sign upfor email alerts.]
I can’t bother to read an article that doesn’t finally define “cancel culture,” nor one that assumes political correctness now demands that one particular color is now capitalized, while all others remain lower case. Why the bigotry against blue, green, and lavender?
I understand your frustration about this Mark, but I respectfully disagree. Black people were kidnapped to this country and enslaved here. Even after they were “freed,” they were treated like crap after Lincoln’s reconstruction project was ended immediately after his assassination. There was a study 15 or so years ago showing that Black people applying for jobs were still substantially discriminated against — white people usually got the jobs even where Blacks were equally or more qualified — so the discrimination has not ended, despite claims to the contrary. Cops, many if not most of whom are racist, unfairly target Black people, and Black people are grossly disproportionately represented in prisons because of that (and other reasons, but this is a main one). These are just examples, I didn’t even mention housing discrimination, which has impoverished Blacks for generations.
The point of all this is that Black people are generally wounded souls so to speak. I say that we show them a little extra compassion and sympathy for their plight. They’ve been discriminated against and oppressed by white people because of the color of their skin. White people haven’t suffered this societal discrimination and oppression. So if Black people ask that we capitalize the name “Black,” I see no reason not to do so. It’s not political correctness, which I also loath. It’s respect and empathy. Ask Black people what they think about this. I have Black friends, including a few close ones, and what I’m saying is in line with their thoughts.
Jeff,
I appreciate your expression of opinion as it pertains to the inherent racism in our society. One very real aspect of this discourse is that the expression of opinion is granted to everyone in this country. We should all be grateful for that.
You are correct when you say that respect should be given to black people. I believe that all persons should have respect shown to them.
You have a common misconception that racism is restricted to black persons in the US. Your statement; [“There was a study 15 or so years ago showing that Black people applying for jobs were still substantially discriminated against — white people usually got the jobs even where Blacks were equally or more qualified “] is a false narrative that has been thrown at us for so long that it is part of the ‘woe is me’ diatribe that we hear every, single day.
There have been many instances where I have been passed up for educational courses, positions in universities, and even regular, menial jobs because of the color of my skin! I am a white person … (an ‘old white guy’ in the {acceptable?}vernacular of an actual, recent POTUS). The excuses given were that the positions, or jobs, or promotions were to be filled by ‘people of color’ before I would be considered. This is from my actual experience, not a ‘study’ done by someone, unnamed, out there, somewhere who really, really, ‘knows’!
Regarding the ‘cops’. My father was one of those ‘cops’ which you mention in your reply. He worked at Ryker’s Island in the NYPD Correction’s Department. He was a racist. he hated black people. He also had ‘pet’ names for everyone else… Polish, Russian, Native American, …even ‘Belgians!?!’ Fortunately, this frame of mind did not transfer over to me as I had the sense to realize that my friends were all of these people that he hated so much. I lived in The Bronx. My buddies consisted of Michael Chang, Tommy da Vita, Bruce Goldman, Bobby Meyer, and finally, John Saunders whom was described by my folks as “Black as the Ace of Spades”. As a little kid I didn’t know (or care)from their racists descriptions of my friends… all I knew was that we were gonna play stick ball today! Thank God I feel that same today as I did then. Not a spark of racism in my soul.
I always have a chuckle when I hear someone say, “I have a friend, a GOOD friend who is black”! … Sooooo unnecessary.
Mark,
Just the fact that you open with “I can’t bother to read an article…” is the exhausting attitude of those who feel it is beneath them to hear the truth of what others are living.
I am an older leftist who worked about 20 hours a week for over ten years trying with everything in me to form groups to do meaningful work to push back at corporations hijacking sovereign rights and using tools like advertising to take control of people’s minds and lives.
Branding became a thing. A thing that now controls most people, those who are incapable of seeing it.
Now no one is gay, they are “queer.” That is a corporate branding move the undermines what gay people went through to gain their rights.
Now heterosexual white women are blamed for all the violent, greedy and toxic things men do, and the feminism that gave them any voice or traction toward the ongoing movement to own and control our bodies and lives is called toxic and regressive by both woman hating conservatives and those who claim to be on the left but who honestly come off as Nazi youths, wearing their rainbow arm bands and doing the queer power salute as they destroy both women’s and gay rights.
Trans culture: pushed by the medical industry complex and the tech wizards, as well as the sex industry, which all profit like bandits (more than oil at this point?) on selling lost people the false idea that “identity” and feelings are facts and facts are lies. How Orwellian.
We are told that language matters more than behavior and trans people are all somehow above the law and we should excuse them for crimes (there are soooo many we can’t keep track now) and let them create laws where they get a heap of special rights and privileges and women are told to shut up or be canceled from jobs, academic platforms, and in fact every facet of life that feminism gained for us.
In fact, demeaning women is like a western pastime now. I am disgusted but not surprised, as sexism on the so called left has always been rampant.
As for the “educated” liberals and lefties who feel superior and therefore more qualified to speak to what other people need, that is usually the most classist and racist group in the room. I know, I was in that room for most of my life.
The fact that you didn’t read the article (so you say) or are unable to grasp the content (more likely) because of your belief system where the blue, green and lavender are somehow victims (please), that is what the article references as the corporate brainwashing and creating an army of useful idiots.
So, thanks for standing up for censorship, and the cry bully culture that is ending free speech and all the hard won rights that the actual radicals who came before you fought and often died to gain.
But hey, those rainbow armbands sure are fancy. I wonder what non-white child in a foreign sweatshop made them for you!
Weaselina, Thank you for this. I have always been abhorred by the mental block exhibited by people when it comes to hearing anything but what is ingrained in them to be the ‘truths’ that they hold so dear.
Your reply is so perfect that, with your permission, I will pass it on. It cannot be said any better.
This is a great column by a great journalist and opinion writer. It was written over a year ago during the midst of the pandemic. At that time, you could easily see the cancel culture operating against anyone who voiced a different opinion — about COVID-19, about how we should deal with it, and about the vaccines for it — than that of the corporate media and government, both of whom were parroting the corporate lines of the pharmaceutical industry that has made tens of billions of dollars on the vaccines. You can see the cancel culture at work right now in silencing everyone who voices an opinion that’s not in lockstep with the U.S. empire in its proxy war in Ukraine. Try voicing a different opinion on the war, Russia, or Putin and see what happens to you. I’ve been unable to continue to voice my opinion online to FRIENDS because of this damn cancel culture to which they’ve been inculcated and brainwashed.
I also fully agree with Chris Hedges’s statements about trying to understand others who have views that you find abhorrent. This can only go so far, and some people are just mean-spirited, but talking to people who have very different views than you do can effect more and better change than insulting, canceling, or censoring them. It can be really hard — my reflex is to view racists as ignorant, mean-spirited people, for example — but I’ve experienced talking to these people and it sometimes works to get them to understand your point of view once you’ve understood theirs.
We have two choices here: we can either continue the cancel culture, which will result in ever more division and hatred, and probably an eventual civil war, or we can talk to and try to relate to each other even when we strongly disagree, and to try to reach some reasonable compromise. I say we try the latter, because we all know where the former will end.
Cancel culture isn’t limited to the left.
The right is implementing its own form of cancel culture and authoritarianism, and it’s just as dangerous and chilling.
Just take a look at what state legislatures and governors are doing in so-called red states—TX and FLA being prime examples. Not to mention what is being said and promoted by many of the right wing politicians in Congress.
I look forward to an article about this in the near future, as overlooking or ignoring this threat from the right endangers all of us as well.
This is where the real work is. I am a post-leftist Anarchist, but the leftist narrative, in support of Empire, has made true anarchist action a right-wing movement.