Beavers are back: here’s what this might mean for the UK’s wild spaces

This article originally appeared in The Conversation.

Editor’s note: “That repair should be the main goal of the environmental movement. Unlike the Neverland of the Tilters’ solutions, we have the technology for prairie and forest restoration, and we know how to use it. And the grasses will be happy to do most of the work for us.”
“To actively repair the planet requires understanding the damage. The necessary repair—the return of forests, prairies, and wetlands—could happen over a reasonable fifty to one hundred years if we were to voluntarily reduce our numbers.”
Deep Green Resistance

The Eurasian beaver, once a common sight across Europe, had disappeared almost entirely by the end of the 16th century thanks to hunting and river modification for agriculture and engineering.

But beavers are making a comeback across the UK and several other countries. They have already been released into the wild in Scotland and within enclosed river sections in England. Now expanding the wild release of beavers across England is on the cards.

Ecosystem recovery, increased biodiversity, flood protection and improved water quality are some of the upsides of having beavers around. But reintroducing wild animals to the landscape is always going to involve trial and error, and it’s vital to understand the possible consequences – both good and bad.

The beaver is a gifted environmental engineer, able to create its own ecological niche – matching itself perfectly to its environment – by building dams. These dams are made from materials the beaver can carry or float – typically wood, stones and mud, but also fence posts, crops from nearby fields, satellite dishes and old kids’ toys.

The dam creates a peaceful, watery home for beaver families to sleep, eat and avoid predators. And the effects of dam building ripple outwards, with the potential to transform entire ecosystems.

Our review of beaver impacts considers evidence from across Europe and North America, where wild beaver populations have been expanding since around the 1950s.

Our review of beaver impacts considers evidence from across Europe and North America, where wild beaver populations have been expanding since around the 1950s.


There is clear evidence that beaver dams increase water storage in river landscapes through creating more ponds and wetlands, as well as raising groundwater levels. This could help rivers – and their inhabitants – handle ever more common weather extremes like floods and droughts.

If you observe beaver dams in the wild, water often comes very close to the top of their dams, suggesting they might not be much help in a flood. Nonetheless, some studies are finding that beaver dams can reduce flood peaks, likely because they divert water onto floodplains and slow downstream flow. However, we don’t know whether beaver dams reliably reduce floods of different sizes, and it would be unwise to assume they’re always capable of protecting downstream structures.

The good news is that it seems all the extra water dams store could help supplement rivers during dry periods and act as critical refuges for fish, amphibians, insects and birds during droughts.


Beaver dams increase the time it takes for things carried by rivers to move downstream. In some cases, this can help slow the spread of pollutants like nitrates and phosphates, commonly used in fertilisers, which can harm fish and damage water quality.

Beavers’ impact on phosphates is unclear, with just as many studies finding phosphorus concentrations increasing downstream of beaver dams as those finding a decrease or no change. But beavers seem especially skilled at removing nitrate: a welcome skill, since high concentrations of nitrates in drinking water could endanger infant health.

Recovering diversity

All that water storage means beavers create a wonderful mosaic of still-, slow- and fast-moving watery habitats. In particular, they increase the biodiversity of river valleys, for example helping macro-invertebrates like worms and snails – key to healthy food chains – to thrive.

Beavers’ departure can leave anything from fens or peatlands to wet floodplain forests to drier grassland meadows developing in their wake. This gives beavers an important role in rewilding efforts.

But nuance is key here. Evidence of beaver dam impacts on fish populations and river valley vegetation, for example, is very mixed. Because they are such great agents of disturbance, beavers promote plants that germinate quickly, like woody shrubs and grasses.

While this can reduce forest cover and help some invasive plants, given time it can also help create valleys with a far richer mosaic of plant life. So although beaver presence is likely to bring benefits, more research is needed to get clearer on precisely how beavers change ecosystems.

Net zero carbon

Beavers are great at trapping carbon by storing organic matter like plant detritus in slow-flowing ponds. However, this also means beaver ponds can be sources of greenhouse gases, like CO₂ and methane, that contribute to the greenhouse effect. This led one author to wonder “whether the beaver is aware the greenhouse effect will reduce demand for fur coats”.

Can beavers still be helpful in achieving net zero carbon? The short-term answer is probably yes, since more carbon seems to be trapped than released by beaver activities.

However, long-term outcomes are less clear, since the amount of carbon that beavers keep in the ground depends on how willing they are to hang around in a river valley – and how willing we are to let them. A clearer understanding of where beavers fit within the carbon cycle of river systems is needed if we are to make best use of their carbon capture skills.


Beavers are reentering landscapes under human dominance, the same thing that originally drove them from vast swathes of European river systems.

In the UK, this means they’ll lack natural predators and may be in competition with cows and sheep for food: possibly resulting in unsteady wild population trajectories.

Although good data on long-term beaver activity is available from Sweden, Norway and Switzerland, our different climate and landscapes mean it’s hard to make a straightforward comparison.

Beavers’ use in rewilding can be incredibly cost-effective, as dam construction and the biodiversity benefits that flow from it is done largely for free. But we need to be tolerant of uncertainty in where and when they choose to do their work.

Working with wild animals – who probably don’t share our priorities – is always an unpredictable process. The expansion of beavers into the wild has a bright future so long as we can manage expectations of people who own and use beaver-inhabited land.

4 thoughts on “Beavers are back: here’s what this might mean for the UK’s wild spaces”

  1. “Voluntary depopulation” is a great idea, but one that is unlikely to be widely practiced until it’s too late. Even if we somehow survive climate change and other pollution-induced catastrophes, we’ll almost certainly run out of several critical resources, over the next few decades.

    The U.N. forecasts a global, 40% water shortage in this decade. We’re on pace to run out of the raw materials that make steel by 2040. The gritty, beach and riverbed sand needed for concrete is almost gone. And the topsoil needed by crops is being lost at the rate of another Pennsylvania, every year.

    Why? Too many people, almost all of them demanding “more” — with Australians, Americans, and Canadians being the worst of the lot. Those three nations use four times the world average in raw materials — and mostly of the “non-renewable” variety.

    The solution is obvious. But (as Derrick Jensen has warned), “We could, but we won’t.” We could easily put an end to unnecessary travel, and shrink the atmosphere-destroying airline industry to a fraction of its size. We could quickly phase out the beef and pork industries, and reduce carbon emissions by close to ten percent. We could get rid of most private autos, and another huge source of pollution.

    To summarize, we could all adopt a goal of using the least quantities of the fewest products, shun imports and exports, put industry to work reforesting the world and cleaning the oceans, and adopt a global one-child ethic for a coule of centuries.

    We could, but we won’t — not until the hasty death of ourselves and our loved ones becomes the obvious and unavoidable price of over-indulging.

    Why? Because capitalism has deluded us into believing that our success is measured by how much we own and consume, rather than by how little we consume, and how much we love, conserve, and restore.

    1. Spot on Mark, with one exception. Capitalism isn’t a root cause of anything; it’s a mere symptom. While capitalism is a cancer that must be cut out of human society in order to have any chance of environmental/ecological success, the problems of human overconsumption and overpopulation began thousands of years before money, let alone capitalism, even existed. Hell, agriculture itself is overconsumption, because 1) it consumes native plants by destroying them to plant crops; and 2) it creates too much food for human consumption, thereby causing overpopulation. Again, this all happened 10,000 years before capitalism existed.

      Otherwise, again, great comment. The roots of these problems lie in the human psyche and bad human attitudes toward life. As I’ve been arguing ad nauseam, until those attitudes change, humans will continue to destroy the Earth and all life on it.

  2. Wow, talk about overthinking something! Where beavers are native but extirpated, they should be restored. Where they’re not native, they shouldn’t be. Simple as that. What if any services they provide humans is quite beside the point, except to self-centered anthropocentric humans. Ecosystems work properly if all of their native species exist in natural numbers, and they don’t work properly if any of the species are missing or suffering greatly lower populations because of humans.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *